Pen_Two
Is not easliy amused.
It seems you aren't keeping up on the direction most of the FoMoCo cars/trucks are all heading.
Or maybe a car from Ford with the quality of my Volkswagen GLI & R32... and performance that's at least somewhere close to my R32, but with 4-doors.
It seems you aren't keeping up on the direction most of the FoMoCo cars/trucks are all heading.
At least Ford doesn't need $ from the goverment. Chryslers best deals Fiat & GM's screwed.
When I bought my SVT Contour (in January 1998) it was a legitimate competitor to the Audi A4 2.8 and BMW 328 (if you read the sidebar in Car & Driver's 1998 A4 2.8/328 comparison test you know what I'm talking about), but where those cars have moved forward in quality and performance the Fusion isn't even as good as its predecessor (the Contour).
DT.
We'll disagree on the SHO but every mag I've read raves about the 2010 Fusion being fun-to-drive :shrug:. That 3.5 Fusion GT despite being a 6spd ATX should be very fun.IAnd before a get a bunch of posts saying I should buy a new Taurus SHO... it's just too big and too ugly. I was hoping the 2010 Fusion might fit the bill; it is after all much better looking than the current model, but it just isn't any fun to drive.
I went to Engineering Open House at U of I. Drove an MKT there and the SHO back. I'm fully in love with SHO after my drive. Zero torque steer, surprisingly tight suspension, 0-60 time of 5.39 (my own run, not the official number), and a 1/4 mile of 13.77 @ 109 mph pulling 0.65 G's of acceleration (again my own run). AWD makes it impossible to break the tires loose. The launch isn't crazy, but once the turbos have a head of steam it pulls like hell. WOT through a 90 deg turn and the body barely rolls. 20s are hot too.