warmonger
Hard-core CEG'er
I would say a S/C is more usable and drivable then a turbo. Sure the Tubro can get you more power and torque but having been in both a S/C and a Turbo CSVT I enjoyed being in the S/C SVT. Would I rock a turbo SVT hell yeah but if I had a choice I would rather a S/C.
Aaron
Both You and Tricker need to reevaluate your statements. There is no comparison with at well designed turbocharged tour to a SC tour.
We aren't talking roots-type blowers here either.
If the turbo seemed to peaky or traction issues then it was sized wrong or the tires weren't up to the task.
The driver/racer shouldn't be detuning his engine to meet the traction requirements of his tires....he should be increasing his traction to keep up with the power he can make.
With our cars it is a balance, but it can be done with the correctly sized turbo. The very reason people like the supercharged tours is that they don't have enough down low power to break traction but the faster you go the more the power comes on. It feels good....but it doesn't feel as good as a turbo car. If you can hold traction the turbo is more like....like THRUST from a rocket. A constant level of torque makes for quite an exhilarating ride. If you can hold it to the road you will eat up a SC tour every time. Also, if your system reliability is higher in the turbo because you can run less boost to make more power meaning the air charge is cooler and the engine safer. There are no pulleys no bearings no shafts, no belts to wreck either.
So I'll say it again, properly constructed it is more reliable, has less parasitic drag and therefore makes better fuel economy, is more powerful, and performs better.