Well, that's a bunch of bad information. The "std" mondeo v6 was the 2.5L which always used the same dual runner design intake manifold, cams, and pistons as the non-svt contour did. Even after the Contour was discontinued. The Mondeo ST200 used the same intake, cams, & pistons as Contour SVT.OK well I'm going to let the cat out of the bag. The ST220 intake is no different then the standard Mondeo intake manifold. As a matter of fact after talking with the UK guys the only difference (engine wise) between the ST220 and the standard Mondeo are three things. Completely different exhaust, different intake air box, and transmission. That's it, nothing more, nothing less. So moral of the story, don't get suckered into paying insane amounts of money for a "ST220" intake.
Well, that's a bunch of bad information. The "std" mondeo v6 was the 2.5L which always used the same dual runner design intake manifold, cams, and pistons as the non-svt contour did. Even after the Contour was discontinued. The Mondeo ST200 used the same intake, cams, & pistons as Contour SVT.
The ST220 had it's own special intake and unique camshafts. Cranks & pistons were the same as the 3.0L Taurus & Escape.
logiclee from MEG said:There were major mechanical differences between the old 2.5V6 and ST200 but not between the 3.0V6 and ST220.
Myself and an old member on here went through the part numbers. The differences between the 3.0V6 and ST220 are airbox (5speed only), exhaust and alternator. The intake side of things including the manifolds and throttle body are the same on both varients as well.
The exhaust is a massive difference though, the 3.0V6 uses the standard 2.5V6 system which is quite restrictive.
Both banks are joined at the manifolds and all 6 cylinders are fed through a common precat then through the main cat, then through the middle silencer, then through the left handle silencer and then piped over to the other side of the car and through the back box.
On the ST220 each bank is kept seperate through twin sports cats and then passed through freeflowing twin entry and exit silencers and to the twin rear silencers.
The power curves for both engines are indenticle all the way upto 5000rpm (There's 3bhp in it at 5k), at the final power peak the standard unit starts to tail off while the ST220 breaths better and longer.
Looking at the extra inlet on the airbox I'm not sure what good that did as it's tiny and they deleted it on the 6 speed models anyway.
As for the Alternator difference? Don't have a clue unless it's a clearance issue on the exhaust manifolds.
Cheers
Lee
Can you do as one member suggested and fill both intakes up with water to see which one holds more volume?And where did you say you got your motor from?
mike would you mind filling yoru plastic manifold too?
mike would you mind filling yoru plastic manifold too?
+1 I want to know the difference. I will try to fill up my EH SVT UIM to compare as well! How did you cap off every hole? So I can do it in a similar manner. No Hurry tho, I know how much time this can take. I just wish my car was in my own garage where I can work on it day in and day out. I gotta buy a house!
- amyn
Well when I said standard I was referring to the 3.0L V6 Mondeo. I talked with the UK Mondeo owners and the engines of the 3.0L ST220 Mondeo versus the 3.0L Mondeo are exactly the same. The only differences with the ST220 are the exhaust and the intake air box.
That's funny...spent nearly a decade working with the Duratec engine and I never knew there was a 3.0L Mondeo vehicle not designated as an ST220. Whenever it was talked about in engineering circles, it was always referred to as being for the ST220 Mondeo.
I like your choice of doing something different with the tips. Is your plan to cut out some of the bumper?
I was always thinking of some D shape tips with the flat side on the bottom so it was flush with the valance.
I'm going to remove my Borla cat-back and recreate it with 3-3.5" T304 stainless steel. I'll buy new Borla mufflers and a Borla resonator.
I chopped my borla catback up and ran a 3" pipe from the y to the stock borla split (keeping the stock borla resonators and tips). I also installed a 3" magnaflow muffler in the main section. 3.5" is overkill in my opinion. One single 3" pipe is enough for an FI build. I kept the stock 2.25 split pipes because that is still more flow than a single 3" section and I wanted to stay close to the stock borla sound. It's bit too louder than I would have liked but it isn't horrible. The 3" pipe definitely sits pretty low as it curves around the gas tank so 3.5" may have some ground clearance issues.