steelblueSE
Hard-core CEG'er
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2003
- Messages
- 1,737
I think the industry today has moved away from this approach somewhat though. It is a trend I don't necessarily agree with.
Aren't IB's mostly for SQ?
I think the industry today has moved away from this approach somewhat though. It is a trend I don't necessarily agree with.
Aren't IB's mostly for SQ?
Rear deck subs...
rookies.
:laugh:
I knew that the only logical difference was the fact that I had changed the amplifier between the two cars. When I realized this I looked into the specs of both amps and then looked at the basic wiring schematics for a Class A/B amp and then that of a Class D amp. The basic diagram I found showed an inductor and a capacitor across the output channel which is not present in a Class A/B amplifier. Since ultimately, the goal of any amplifier is to control the speaker (not let the speaker do whatever it wants) I came to the realization that having the inductor and capacitor across the output channel could certainly affect the amplifier's ability to control the movement of the woofer cone.
Being an IB setup, the woofer cone's movement is even more critical than it is when it is in a sealed enclosure due to the fact that there is (virtually) no pressure buildup/decrease caused by the cone's movement. I believe this is why Class D amps work ok when powering subs in sealed enclosures but I don't think that that it's the best solution.
That's a pretty interesting theory you have there 99Mystique. I never heard anything like this before. So are you saying that Class A/B amps performs better than Class D amps in sealed boxes? If so, please go into details. I'm asking for your knowledge on this so that I have a better understanding.