Yeah, the stangs from 94/95(mine is a 95 so I know lol) have a tip in retard that pulls a ton of timing from the motor between shifts. This makes it alot less stressful on the trans during hard shifting although you give up alot time(and fun)wise. Ways to fix it are to downgrade to the foxbody computer, chip the SN95 computer or just powershift.
Yup. Glad you mentioned it as a downgrade to the A9L; too many people don't realize that the J4J1, and well, any EEC4 is significantly better platform than the EEC3, they just get hung up on a few of the calibration parameters and think the whole thing sucks. I'm glad the shortsightedness of switching back to the EEC3 is wearing off in the mustang crowd. Fwiw, I do know a thing or 3 about mustangs

I've paid my dues many times over in the Mustang world, lol.
As far as the T5 goes, built ones are now actually very comparable to the TKOs and cheaper than a built T-56. I would not put a stock one behind a 375hp motor, even a duratec. At any rate, we'd have to wait for someone to do it to see. At this point I'm more concerend with my Cobra for RWD and I'll probably just do the 3.0L swap with a diy turbo and a built rod shifted MX-75 when I go nuts on the CSVT. A guy at my father in law's work has a 500+whp Civic hatch and runs 9s at the track with FWD so I think FWD in the CSVT is fine lol. Like I said, already have a RWD car that has probably the largest aftermarket out there except maybe the 350 small block.
First, in light of the application, I would never consider a built-up T56. They are very expensive, and not all that great anyway, hard to shift, durability isn't the best when run hard, and a typical OEM T56 is more than adequate to support more power than any driveable Duratec 3.0L has been able to produce. (I'm not counting that silly Duttweiler Focus wagon). I think a regular T5 would be fine given the Tq curves of typical high power Duratecs. Unless you're running nitrous, there just isn't hit of tq. If its for drag racing on really sticky tires, then I'd start wondering about the input shaft, and 2nd gear, but otherwise, I think it would be fine even at the elevated power levels. Certainly not OEM durability, but it would be decent enough. I've seen 500hp turbocharged 5.0L mustangs run stock T5s for long periods of time with no issues as long as the car isn't being abused. Heck, a few of them I've seen the blocks split in half before the T5 lets go.
My CSVT is certainly staying FWD, just because I'd rather have it as an enjoyable daily driver than a garage queen; and simply doing a 3.0L and some other upgrades to it nearly turned it into a garage queen, I don't want to make it worse
