A positive diplacement supercharger is being used, not a centrifugal.
Well.....
CRAP!
A positive diplacement supercharger is being used, not a centrifugal.
OMG! ive been hoping sumbody would do this. I was going to get your turbo kit but then i decided it wasnt for me beacuase i want to have constant power. Maybe I dont want to have the most horsepower of the bunch but, I want to have a constant powerband in which a supercharger provides. props to you guys at Nautilus for doing this. Id deffintly be intrested in getting one from you guys.
a few ?`s for yah though:
Like BigBen said is there any time frame for when you think youd posibly have this kit availbe?
And what kinda of power do you think this kit could be cable of? (275-300 fwhp?)
Also im gonna be doing a custom exhaust soon and am gonna go with the coated MSDS headers from you guys and was wondering if these would still work with the supercharger kit or what?
well anyway keep up the good work! and i cant wait to see the finished product
couldn't a KB or Whipple possibily fit there one day?
well thinking about it now. the KB as far as i know are more directed to larger V8's. now with whipple's im not sure. but either way i think that it would way to much s/c for a small V6 such as the 2.5L or 3.0L. but im not the one with brains but its just a thought or opinion.
now a ported eaton. thats dueable isnt it?
OMG! ive been hoping somebody would do this. I was going to get your turbo kit but then i decided it wasn't for me because i want to have constant power. Maybe I don't want to have the most horsepower of the bunch but, I want to have a constant power band in which a supercharger provides. props to you guys at Nautilus for doing this. Id definitely be interested in getting one from you guys.
Ok, maybe it is because I turboed a V8, but superchargers do not compare to turbos in terms of a "constant power band".
On a turbo 5.0 the torque graph is generally VERY flat, whereas a supercharger's torque graph climbs with rpm.
The turbo also has the advantage of operating at a specific boost pressure the entire time it is spooled, unlike that supercharger what's boost pressure grows with rpm.
Now, the positive displacement supercharger, unlike a centrifugal supercharger or turbo, has little if any rpm delay while the boost threshold is reached.
You may also wish to consider that a supercharger ALWAYS places drag on an engine, consuming power, whereas a turbo does not. You also see less of an impact on off boost fuel economy with a turbo, because off boost a turbo is not a being a parasite.
Do not get me wrong though, I think this project is awesome and I have always though it would be nice to have a positive displacement blower on a contour.
now with whipple's im not sure. but either way i think that it would way to much s/c for a small V6 such as the 2.5L or 3.0L. but im not the one with brains but its just a thought or opinion.
Why not look into the new Eaton TVS blowers?