Where is that slap flight smiley..... Find and ButtonPuncher well done in refusing to take a personal attack to pms. I suggest you both give the thread a break so the mods don't have to do anything.
Find, claim whatever you want but next time post proof of your claims. You have zero credibility in my eyes currently. When you believe something is true and it goes against logic you have the burden of proof, not everyone else.
That being said, a lot of wild and crazy things have been postulated in this thread. If anyone can provide some outside proof for or against any of it please post links. I'm going to go dig for some knock sensor related threads...
Math and Physics is where I live. You need to reevaluate your logic. Plus, I did suggest several times you guys follow up with what I said and read in the places I told you too, unfortunately, no one wanted to do that, they would rather insist that I am wrong based on gut feelings and old wives tales..... I have provided the following links to get you started, if you require more, please ask. This should settle things.
OCTANE
http://www.squidoo.com/octane
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Which_gasoline_brand_provides_the_best_fuel_mileage
(total search time to find these four pages with relevant factual information, around 5 seconds.)
http://www.epinions.com/content_5329363076
http://www.carbibles.com/fuel_engine_bible_pg3.html
It's a common misconception amongst car enthusiasts that higher octane = more power. This is simply not true. The myth arose because of sportier vehicles requiring higher octane fuels. Without understanding why, a certain section of the car subculture decided that this was because higher octane petrol meant higher power.
The reality of the situation is a little different. Power is limited by the maximum amount of fuel-air mixture that can be jammed into the combustion chamber. Because high performance engines operate with high compression ratios they are more likely to suffer from detonation and so to compensate, they need a higher octane fuel to control the burn. So yes, sports cars do need high octane fuel, but it's not because the octane rating is somehow giving more power. It's because it's required because the engine develops more power because of its design.
There is a direct correlation between the compression ratio of an engine and its fuel octane requirements. The following table is a rough guide to octane values per engine compression ratio for a carburettor engine without engine management. For modern fuel-injected cars with advanced engine management systems, these values are lowered by about 5 to 7 points.
NOW, if there are problems with zetecs regarding tuning, then I am afraid that is something I am not aware of, and HAVE NEVER observed in any zetec car I have owned, including my zetec contour.
LED
http://www.extragasmileage.com/how-led-lighting-can-help-your-car-be-greener/
http://www.leftlanenews.com/led-lights-stylish-and-fuel-efficient.html
However, LED equipped
vehicles save about a gallon of gas a week over cars with conventional bulbs, according to the Detroit Free Press.
If you really need more, I can start digging up trucking articles. The military also uses LEDs for their longevity and energy conservation attributes. FWIW, I use all LEDs on my truck, and as I have said before, they do draw less wattage, even the ones that are just as bright. If you like, I can provide you links to illustrate the differences in lumens/watt, however LEDs produce more lumens/watt. The fact that LEDs draw less power is indisputable however, because an incandescent bulb uses much of the wattage it draws to generate heat. LEDs only generate light. The heat generated by an incandescent bulb is not free, light is a by-product of that heat, and this is a VERY inefficient way to produce light. The reduced load does not amount to much, but it still all adds up.
ETHANOL AS AN OCTANE BOOSTER
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/24/video-ethanol-gets-worse-mileage/
HOT AIR
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081006122707AA3BcH0
http://www.gassavers.org/archive/index.php/How-to-build-your-own-Warm-Air-Intake-WAI/t-244.html
(granted, a cold air intake can still increase fuel mileage over a stock intake, but a stock intake is just a restrictive cold air intake)
http://geometroforum.com/topic/3001427/1/
http://geometroforum.com/topic/2876020/1/
a warmer intake charge will not create higher combustion temperatures, and that is strangely one of the assumptions you guys seem to be operating on, warmer intake charge just means a warmer charge to ignite, therefore it takes LESS energy to heat it to it's flash point, meaning you can spread the heat of ignition further faster resulting in a faster burn. On the contrary, a cold air charge will lead to higher combustion temperatures, because denser air and fuel can be equated to higher cylinder pressure...... Therefore you need MORE fuel on top of the fuel it takes to create a good mixture to reduce combustion temperatures. Don't feel too bad about this one, because so far, very few people I have encountered on this forum actually knew this..... MapOfTaziFoSho, Harrry, and a couple other people..... I could look some more and demonstrate my point about the lower pumping losses by the throttle being opened wider, but, I dont really think anyone on here is disputing the fact that that will give a small gain, and as we all know, it all adds up.
I've enjoyed being flamed so far, hopefully this will put an end to it.
Has anyone made an underbody tray for a contour?
btw sorry, I hadnt noticed this earlier, but no, noone has made nor does make an underbody tray for a contour. One would have to fabricate it themselves, of course the front and the rear would be the most important parts to cover, if one skinned the full bottom of the car as best as possible, that would be the best case scenario.